Agnosticism, Atheism, Christianity, Faith, God, Religion, Truth

Matthew 24: Let’s Hear All the Theories

In the comment section of my last post, several points were made about Matthew 24. It’s not the easiest passage to come to terms with. When I was a believer, I had trouble nailing down exactly what was being talked about in this chapter, because much of the language is figurative, and… well… a straight reading of the chapter can be a bit problematic for Christians. To illustrate, let’s jump in and take the entire chapter piece by piece:

Jesus left the temple and was going away, when his disciples came to point out to him the buildings of the temple. 2 But he answered them, “You see all these, do you not? Truly, I say to you, there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.”

3 As he sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?”

So Jesus tells the disciples that the temple will be torn down, so they ask him 2 or 3 questions, depending on how you read this: 1) When will the temple be destroyed? 2) What will be the sign of your coming? 3) What will be the sign of the end of the age?

“Your coming” and “end of the age” could be tricky. They’re vague enough that people could get into some heavy speculation about what they might mean. Most of us, if we’re just allowing the passage to speak for itself, probably assume these terms are talking about the “Day of Judgment,” the “end of the world,” the “final reckoning.” And there’s good reason for thinking that. The book of Matthew talks about the Day of Judgment a fair amount (Matt 10:15, 11:22, 24, 12:36, 42). In fact, there are two passages that are worth looking at in more detail. We’ll look at one now, but we’ll save the other for the end of the post.

The first is the “Parable of the Weeds,” which can be found in Matt 13:24-30. The explanation of that parable is given in verses 36-43:

Then he left the crowds and went into the house. And his disciples came to him, saying, “Explain to us the parable of the weeds of the field.” He answered, “The one who sows the good seed is the Son of Man. The field is the world, and the good seed is the sons of the kingdom. The weeds are the sons of the evil one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are angels. Just as the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so will it be at the end of the age. The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers, and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears, let him hear.

Verses 47-50 say the same basic thing. This is what I think the disciples are asking about here in Matt 24. I’m sure some of you feel differently, and I’d like to hear your thoughts in the comment section. But for now, I’m going to assume they’re asking about the Day of Judgment.

Let’s continue:

4 And Jesus answered them, “See that no one leads you astray. 5 For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead many astray. 6 And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for this must take place, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are but the beginning of the birth pains.

So the disciples seem to be asking about the destruction of the temple, as well as the Day of Judgment. It could be that they were wrong to assume that these 2 or 3 questions they asked had anything to do with one another, but Jesus doesn’t correct them — he simply starts answering. He says there will be false Christs and political unrest, as well as natural disasters. But the end won’t happen yet.

9 “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and put you to death, and you will be hated by all nations for my name’s sake. 10 And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another. 11 And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. 12 And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. 13 But the one who endures to the end will be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.

So after the false Christs, political upheaval, and natural disasters, Christians will become persecuted by everyone. Many Christians will fall away because of it, but the gospel will still be preached and it will go throughout the entire world. Then the end will come.

Of course, much of this is still pretty vague. When are there not wars and rumors of wars? When are there not natural disasters? And what degree of religious persecution is Jesus referring to here?

15 “So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. 17 Let the one who is on the housetop not go down to take what is in his house, 18 and let the one who is in the field not turn back to take his cloak. 19 And alas for women who are pregnant and for those who are nursing infants in those days! 20 Pray that your flight may not be in winter or on a Sabbath. 21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be. 22 And if those days had not been cut short, no human being would be saved. But for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short.

This seems to be speaking more about the destruction of Jerusalem, since it focuses on Judea. Referencing the “abomination of desolation” could refer to almost anything. In the Book of Daniel, it seems to reference Antiochus Epiphanes, but he had died long before Jesus’ time. It’s hard to say what Jesus may have interpreted it to mean.

Since this section seems to deal with the fall of Jerusalem, it would have been a great time for Jesus to tell the disciples that Judgment Day would come many centuries later. But he doesn’t do that. Instead, he seems to roll right into a description of the end times:

23 “Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. 24 For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you beforehand. 26 So, if they say to you, ‘Look, he is in the wilderness,’ do not go out. If they say, ‘Look, he is in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. 27 For as the lightning comes from the east and shines as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 28 Wherever the corpse is, there the vultures will gather.

He warns them to not be led away by false Christs. And I think verse 27 is saying that when the “Son of Man” comes, everyone will know it. There will be no need to “spread the word” — it will be evident.

29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 30 Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

This passage says that after the preceding events, the Son of Man will come with great power and glory. His angels will gather the elect from the entire earth. What could this be, but the Judgment? It matches up very well with Jesus’ explanation of the “Parable of the Weeds” that we read earlier. Matthew 24 then follows up with this section:

32 “From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts out its leaves, you know that summer is near. 33 So also, when you see all these things, you know that he is near, at the very gates. 34 Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.

So when you see these things happen, you’ll know that the time is near. Verse 34 then says that these events would occur within their lifetime. Which events? All of them. Of course, that didn’t happen. And that’s why so many Christians wrangle with this passage and try to find another meaning for it. It’s also important to notice an earlier passage in Matthew that says the same thing (Matt 16:26-28):

For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul? For the Son of Man is going to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay each person according to what he has done. Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.”

Jesus apparently expected the end of the world to occur within a few decades at the most. 2000 years and a lot of other failed “end of the world” prophecies later, and we’re still here.

But what about the rest of the chapter? Does it say anything to make us rethink the notion that Jesus’ prediction of the end of the world was so wrong?

36 “But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. 37 For as were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, 39 and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 40 Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken and one left. 41 Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one left. 42 Therefore, stay awake, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. 43 But know this, that if the master of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. 44 Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.

45 “Who then is the faithful and wise servant, whom his master has set over his household, to give them their food at the proper time? 46 Blessed is that servant whom his master will find so doing when he comes. 47 Truly, I say to you, he will set him over all his possessions. 48 But if that wicked servant says to himself, ‘My master is delayed,’ 49 and begins to beat his fellow servants and eats and drinks with drunkards, 50 the master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he does not know 51 and will cut him in pieces and put him with the hypocrites. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

So Jesus goes on to say that no one, only God, knows the day and hour that the end will come. Jesus himself didn’t even know. Does that change things? Does that mean that his earlier decree can be ignored? I don’t think so. Jesus (more than once) said that the end would come within a generation. The passage we just read simply says that the exact day and time was unknown. Jesus gave them a time range of decades, but could be no more specific than that.

This chapter, both in the way the disciples asked their questions and in the way Jesus answered them, gives the impression that Rome’s destruction of Jerusalem would herald the coming end of the world. If you think about it, that’s not all that surprising. Jerusalem fell in 70 AD, and most scholars believe the gospel of Matthew was written 10-20 years after that event. We don’t know who the author of Matthew was, but he was obviously very focused on the Mosaic Law — it’s likely that he was Jewish, or at least a proselyte. Imagine the shock he would have felt when Jerusalem fell! How could God allow that to happen, especially so soon after the “Messiah” had come? I don’t find it surprising that such a Christian would assume that signs like these must mean the end of the world was coming. And if Jesus was a real person, it’s possible he preached that the end was near as well. Every generation, a handful of people make doomsday prophecies. Some of the Old Testament prophets did too. But regardless of the author’s motivation, the end result still seems rather evident: Jesus (or at least the gospel writer) believed the end of the world was a few short years away, and he was dead wrong.

Like I said, when I was a Christian, I struggled to “make sense” of Matthew 24, because I just knew it couldn’t mean what it “seemed” to say. Now that I no longer have to make passages fit the end result I’m looking for, passages like this seem much clearer to me. But what do you think? Am I totally off in my analysis?

186 thoughts on “Matthew 24: Let’s Hear All the Theories”

  1. Arch, Regarding the concept of the “immortal soul,” it is a completely pagan idea. Unfortunately many of the folks in the Greco-Roman world tried to understand the revelation of the New Covenant with this baggage. This is what led to the false concept of eternal torment. If a soul was immortal by nature, it could not die. The Gospels are very clear on the reality that the soul/spirit can perish and die (see John 3:16 and Matthew 10:28). The choice has always been between eternal life and eternal death.

    Like

  2. Wow, you open your email, click on a link, and you get a whole basketful of crazy!

    However we know that the atmospheric conditions of the early earth precluded the view of the Sun, Moon, and stars from the Earth’s surface until the fourth day when the atmosphere had been cleared by the production of oxygen.

    Marc, early Earth’s atmosphere consisted primarily of Hydrogen, Nitrogen, and Amonia. As the corpses of the single-celled creatures, that began through abiogenesis, decayed, their decomposition released oxygen, a chemical, at the time, in short supply. After several million years, this process changed the atmosphere of Earth, LONG after the “fourth day,” to the point that those organisms that couldn’t adapt to an oxygenated atmosphere, died, and those which, through evolution, could so adapt, lived, and here we are! Taa-Daaa!

    Like

  3. Arch, I think you overlooked the CO2 released by the considerable vulcanism and the heavy bombardment period.

    Like

  4. RE: “you are old enough to be my father”

    Actually, I’m far older than that: “Archaeopteryx (/ˌɑrkiːˈɒptərɨks/ AR-kee-OP-tər-iks), sometimes referred to by its German name Urvogel (“original bird” or “first bird”), is a genus of early bird that is transitional between feathered dinosaurs and modern birds. The name derives from the ancient Greek ἀρχαῖος (archaīos) meaning “ancient”, and πτέρυξ (ptéryx), meaning “feather” or “wing”. Since the late nineteenth century, it had been generally accepted by palaeontologists, and celebrated in lay reference works, as being the oldest known bird (member of the group Avialae).”

    As far as your being married is concerned, clearly that hasn’t stopped you from flirting with me!

    “I do get a kick out of you (in the most irritating way) though.” – of course you do, because you’re crazy about me!

    That DOESN’T mean, however, that there is any validity to anything you’ve said about the scriptures.

    Like

  5. It was the presence of the stromatolites beginning 3.8 billion years ago that cleared the primordial atmosphere of CO2 with oxygen and changed the atmosphere from opaque to clear.

    Like

  6. Actually, Alexander did far more, without ever intentionally realizing it, to promote the Judeo/Christian religion than anyone of his time. By conquering the area bordering the Mediterranean, he inadvertentely spread Greek thought, which included, in addition to the language, in which the entire NT is written, all of Greek thought and philosophy, including the fact that the Greeks believed that their gods were perfect and could do no wrong – this philosophy, applied to a desert god who had advocated the murder, in fact, the annihilation of entire races of peoples, became the merciful god of the New Testament, who only kills you if you don’t kiss his ass.

    Like

  7. RE: “Arch, If you are delusional about Laurie, why should we take you seriously on any other matter?”

    Marc, I wouldn’t expect you to take me seriously, regardless of the conditions, because cognitive dissonance can break your brain!

    Like

  8. Arch, The God of the Old and the New Testament is the God of the resurrection. In what ever manner one dies, they still have the capacity to live through the grace of God. The ancient Church’s understanding of the Harrowing of Hades and the precepts of the Gospel confirm this reality.

    Like

  9. Arch, I believe that the conquests of Alexander and the Roman Empire created the infrastructure necessary for the spread of the Gospel.

    Like

  10. “It was the presence of the stromatolites beginning 3.8 billion years ago that cleared the primordial atmosphere of CO2 with oxygen and changed the atmosphere from opaque to clear.”

    Which brings me back to my point, Marc, stromatolites = “a calcareous mound built up of layers of lime-secreting cyanobacteria and trapped sediment, found in Precambrian rocks as the earliest known fossils,” meaning, in English – Like I said!

    Like

  11. obviously my interpretation of scriptures seems way out there to most people, but here is what I think about Matt 24. The apostles never understood what Yeshua said. He spoke to the people in parables. Why? Seeing they would not see, and hearing they would not hear. It wasn’t until after the resurrection that He revealed the scriptures to them.

    Yeshua says that this generation will not pass, heaven and earth will pass away, but MY WORDS will never pass. It is His testimony that never passes, His words. Everyday when millions of people open their bibles, the prophecy comes true.

    This isn’t any different than when he asked Peter “do you love me?” “feed my sheep”. This was a prophecy about Peter being deceived, and not protecting the testimony as it was delivered to him. Did the apostles understand this? No, they thought he was saying that John was going to live forever.

    There are many reasons that we can know He did not believe this was going to happen in their lifetime. He actually told them they would be killed, so it could not have meant in their lifetime. It was not meant to be easily understood, YHWH was and is testing us, just like He said He would.

    And Arch, the New Testament was written in Aramaic not Greek. Sorry Mensa, wrong again!

    Like

  12. Though it may be once in a row, I’m inclined to agree. Prior to the Alexandrian conquest, the Jews were confined to their homeland. After the conquest, all residents were allowed to move freely throughout the area of the conquest – this allowed Jewish thought to spread to Alexandria, rather than die the death it deserved in the Levant, along with all of the other baseless religions of the area.

    Like

  13. Laurie, you’re right that Jesus says (in verse 35) that his words will last forever. But that does not change what he says in verse 34, where he tells them that “all these things” will take place within their current generation. In Luke 9:26-27, he seems to say the same thing:

    For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words, of him will the Son of Man be ashamed when he comes in his glory and the glory of the Father and of the holy angels. But I tell you truly, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God.”

    Like

  14. Arch, lucky for you I have a computer for the night, cause I would hate for you to have to look things up your self!

    http://www.scribd.com/collections/3769399/d-Evidence-of-an-original-Aramaic-Re-Newed-Covenant

    First off,the apostles and Yeshua spoke Aramaic. Secondly, there are over 600 errors in the Greek that do not exist in the Aramaic. You don’t have to be a mensa geek to figure out what that means. Aramaic is a poetic language, so the poor translation into Greek leaves much to be desired! Didn’t we go through this already! I am sure we did, when His genealogy came up.

    Like

Leave a comment