A Problem with Immortality

Well, sorry I’ve been away so long. Things are going well — I’ve just been busy with work and haven’t had a whole lot to say lately. But yesterday, I ran across a really interesting article that I wanted to share with all of you.

Paul Sagar, the author of the article, discusses several possible problems with the notion of immortality and asks if it’s even something we should really want. But what I found most interesting was his suggestion that our innate desire for immortality might not really be about wanting to live forever, but about being able to control when we die.

Christopher Hitchens famously said:

I do not especially like the idea that one day I shall be tapped on the shoulder and informed, not that the party is over but that it is most assuredly going on — only henceforth in my absence.

That seems to be the hard part. We worry that our time will come too soon, when there are too many things left undone — too many people still around that we want to spend time with.

But if you live long enough, it seems that there would come a time when that’s no longer the case. When most of the people you’d want to spend time with have already left the party too. Or when your body has worn out to the point that you’re just ready for that final slumber.

And perhaps just as great a fear is living too long. We all know people who have suffered with Alzheimer’s or dementia. Or those who have become physically disabled to the point that they can no longer do the simplest of tasks and remain in great pain. Death can seem like a blessing in those instances.

Of course, when people talk about immortality, they’re really talking about living forever in a perfect state — good health and access to loved ones. Would such an immortality be a good thing? I don’t really know. In the same quote, Hitchens went on to say:

Much more horrible, though, would be the announcement that the party was continuing forever, and that I was forbidden to leave. Whether it was a hellishly bad party or a party that was perfectly heavenly in every respect, the moment that it became eternal and compulsory would be the precise moment that it began to pall.

I can see his point, though this is something I go back and forth over. Maybe such an eternity wouldn’t get boring. Either way, I think most of us wish we had more time than what we typically get.

Of course, it doesn’t really matter whether we wish we had more time or not — wishing for a thing doesn’t make it so. We don’t live forever. And I don’t have any reason to believe that some part of us will continue on after death. So we’re left to focus on living the one life we do have to the fullest extent possible. Take care of those we care about; take advantage of the opportunities we’re given; make the most of each moment; live with as few regrets as possible.

Anyway, nothing I’ve said here is revolutionary or even definitive. I’ve really just been typing out my own thoughts on this. So, more importantly, take a second to read that article, if you haven’t already. I especially enjoyed the story about Bhishma, taken from target=”_blank”>Mahabharata.

25 thoughts on “A Problem with Immortality”

  1. Great to see you back Nate. I have thought long and hard on immortality and concluded it is not something I desire. As I heard someone quip once, ‘if there is eternal life it would want to be a darn site better than this life’.

    I think one would get very bored quite quickly if eternal life resembled our current life.

    When I was a Christian I used to read the Book of Revelation and think how tiring it must be to keep getting up and bowing before God and saying praise. Then I would admonish myself for such a terrible thought. I was quite relieved when Sean Carroll explained that continuation of consciousness after death was not possible as consciousness was reliant on the continued existence of our physical brain.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Looks who’s back!
    Considering the vastness of the universe I find the prospect of immortality – or at least being in such a position as to choose when I died quite appealing to be honest.

    Imagine being in a position to explore all our oceans. How about being around at a time when intergalactic travel is possible? A tour of the stars might be fun,
    Zoom down a black hole!

    A book called Marrow, by Robert Reed in part explores the idea of a form of human immortality. The characters have developed technology to the point where the body simply regenerates on a continuous basis. Even after severe trauma or accident. Through technology the human skeleton has evolved to become virtually indestructible under normal conditions and normal death is a thing of the past.
    It’s been while since i read it but if memory serves, during the time frame of the book the characters live for several hundred thousand years and there is mention toward the end of a life of millions.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. It seems to me, Nate, that it is one of those concepts that man has devised to reassure himself that he is different from any other species. Certainly above animals, for instance. What hubris, to even imagine one could live forever! When you really analyze it though, I suppose it does tackle the fear of death. I am thinking of my next door neighbour. She’s in her late 60’s and has pancreatic cancer, inoperable. She’s been told the chemo will prolong her life but she’s basically been given a death sentence. Right from the beginning, she has been stoic and even – most days – cheerful, as she truly believes she’s going to be with Jesus. ( and her recently departed father) In this case, I can see that wishful thinking serves a very powerful psychological need – coping with the finality of life.
    Good to see you back!

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Hi guys! Good to be back! I’ll try to make it a regular thing.

    Thanks for the comments. And Ark, that book sounds amazing… I’m gonna add it to my reading list right now. I agree with you that there are so many things I’d love to know more about, and I regret that my limited life span won’t let me experience them.

    Being a fan of role playing games and video games, I sometimes wish I could live different versions of my life just to have different experiences and live out different possibilities.

    Like

  5. I would be OK with living 5 billion years as long as I could take a 100 year nap every once in a while. This way I would have 100 years to catch up on thus helping to eliminate the boredom. Otherwise count me out on immortality. 🙂

    Liked by 4 people

  6. A friend and I were discussing this very thing one time and she said, “Jesus! When I’m dead I’ll finally be able to sleep!” 🙂 (Of course we laughed uproariously — there might have been wine involved)

    Liked by 3 people

  7. If you just ask people if they would like to live forever, almost all will consider it and many say “yes.” If you frame the question differently, such as “If you had a very debilitating disease that was not curable (brain cancer, etc.) but was very painful, would you want your life extended by one year?” I think most people would say “No thanks!”

    There are conditions applied to this immortality desire, so I think the general claim that people fear death and want everlasting life is bogus as the conditions are unstated. Even Christians are confused on this with some of them saying that if we accept Jesus as our Lord and Savior(tm) we will receive everlasting life. Obviously this is a bogus claim. Those people believe we all have immortal souls, so everyone gets everlasting life, it just depends upon the conditions we end up living in. And, while Christians can wax poetically about Hell and why you wouldn’t want to be there, they say very, very little about Heaven and why we would want to be there (other than as an alternative to Hell).

    Liked by 4 people

  8. Back when I was Christian (and that’s a long time ago), I was already beginning to suspect that heaven would be a very boring place.

    I sometimes joke that sitting around the camp fire seems more attractive that listening to that piped in harp muzak.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Stick to the Great Ship novels, although Sister Alice is a wild stand alone read. The Greatship (collection of shorts) is essential, make that your first rehit. Then Well of Stars, followed by the most recent, Dragons of Marrow. Dragons of Marrow, though, is directly related to Memory of Sky, which says it’s a Great Ship book, but confuses the hell out of everyone. It, too, is absolutely essential for Dragons of Marrow to make any sense. Then there’s a bunch of quite recent shorts, like Eater of Bone, Katabasis, Sarcophogus. These all have a reference to the Great Ship in the title, so you know which ones to get. All good. Many of the shorts are contained in The Greatship, so be sure not to double up.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Welcome back!

    I can definitely say that it’s true for me as well. I certainly would like to live a lot longer than I am going to, because I think it would be interesting to observe change on longer timescales, but the main problem is that it’s really not up to me. I want to tell death when I’m ready to go, and not get the tap on the shoulder as Hitchens put it. I would imagine this is the thrust for ideas of the afterlife a way of distracting people away from what they are leaving behind and giving them some nice thoughts of where they are going to.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. I have been thinking about this more and more since losing my faith and after working in Senior Living at my last job for several years. I personally still hope there is an afterlife and a God, although I still don’t know what the ideal of either would be anymore. In case there is not I am trying to live this life to the fullest and would be happy if I die an old lady in my sleep and if I go before Aubrie and any other future children. That is the most I think I can hope for.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Amanda an afterlife and God might be something to look forward to if the being is benevolent, but most religions suggest that a divine being operates more like a standover merchant. Given the downside of being on the wrong side of such a being I would rather cut my losses and hope there is no afterlife.

    If consciousness ceases then that is good enough for me.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. The concept of immortality has been one that have come to my mind a lot of times.

    It would be fun, if I could live through life with different experiences, kind of like living different lives every generation, learn everything learn-able, explore everything explore-able. But this could get boring very quickly as the article points out especially if your friends and family who make life meaningful dies and leave you
    In the Fox series Lucifer, the character Cain ( cursed by god with immortality ) has a problem having a close relationship with people. His reasoning is that the is no point forming close bonds and relationship with people, when he knows he would outlive them and subject himself to the emotional turmoil of losing a loved one every time

    A couple of years back I watched/read ( can’t remember which ) a story about the DC comics immortal character Vandal Savage. Basically in it, Savage through his actions causes humanity to end only him remains
    How would life be if you are the only person left in a party you can’t leave

    I think in most cases, if you have immortality, you would reach a point where you are living without actually living

    Now most of what the article says and the other comments say even mine, is from the perspective of us being aware that our time is limited. But would we view immortality differently if that was the normal state of things?, if we never even had a concept of death, how different would our approach be
    I think if right from the start of humanity existence, they was no such thing as death we would have potentially found a way to make our infinite time worthwhile

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Peter while I believer I always struggled with a God who would create people only for them to end up being tortured for an eternity. Even if I made the cut, how could I enjoy Heaven knowing others would suffer and be in Heaven with a God like that? At my deepest faith I just trusted that God would be fair. For those of you who want to laugh about this subject, I have enjoyed the Good Life on NBC (also on Netflix and Hulu I believe as well). I like how it points out some of the obvious flaws of most major religions but in a way we can all laugh about it,

    Liked by 1 person

  15. CS Lewis once said that people claiming Heaven as boring because of “singing and playing harps” should be told that childlike understandings of adult topics means you shouldn’t speak on them.

    Heaven is our Home. There is no place we would rather be. The rationalization against it shown here is merely the fact that hell begins on earth. The greatest pain of hell is shame over knowing who God is and that you will never see Him again, and worse that you chose this and God Loved you so much that even with all the suffering you deserved worse.

    As Venerable Fulton Sheen said (ironically, already in my clipboard):
    “As all men are touched by God’s love, so all are also touched by the desire for His intimacy. No one escapes this longing; we are all kings in exile, miserable without the Infinite. Those who reject the grace of God have a desire to avoid God, as those who accept it have a desire for God. The modern atheist does not disbelieve because of his intellect, but because of his will; it is not knowledge that makes him an atheist…The denial of God springs from a man’s desire not to have a God—from his wish that there were no Justice behind the universe, so that his injustices would fear not retribution; from his desire that there be no Law, so that he may not be judged by it; from his wish that there were no Absolute Goodness, that he might go on sinning with impunity. That is why the modern atheist is always angered when he hears anything said about God and religion—he would be incapable of such a resentment if God were only a myth. His feeling toward God is the same as that which a wicked man has for one whom he has wronged: he wishes he were dead so that he could do nothing to avenge the wrong. The betrayer of friendship knows his friend exists, but he wished he did not; the post-Christian atheist knows God exists, but he desires He should not.”

    Like

  16. . . . .because – of course – Sheen knows the mind of every atheist. (As do so many of the brainwashed)
    Jesus H. Christ what a bunch of nonsense.

    Nate will no doubt reply with much more diplomacy. He has no control over the rest of us, though. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  17. The good Archbishop absolutely does. As Sheen also said, “never pay attention to what someone says, only why they say it.” This advice lets you cut right through the BS to get right to the heart of your position: an emotional, prideful reaction to recognizing your own sinfulness while not being strong enough to admit it.

    Usually it is born out of you erroneously believing your shame over sin is due to having heard of God. Nonsense, as you would be ashamed even if you never heard of God. shame is just your natural reaction due to sin; being a creation of God and contingent upon God, your very being goes into revulsion at being separated from God (sin) as it literally kills your soul (which is what animates you as well as gives you intellect and free will).

    If “nate” has a problem, he will get both barrels; same as I give to any intellectually dishonest person I meet. These support groups you lot have for one another usually involve you needing to repeat your gnostic dogma to each other ad infinitum in the hopes it keeps the realization of what you have done to yourself from settling in. It is why I see the same characters over so many of these blogs. you hope you can create an emotional bulwark around the Truth by these things.

    Now, again, no one is damned without knowing God and why exactly you have chosen damnation for yourself. That shame hurts more than hellfire and the torture of fellow inmates by an infinite degree.

    Please read that quote that you ignored though. I carefully chose it to be devastating.

    Like

  18. With a slight modification, your comment is turned on its head and aptly describes folks like you …

    These support groups you lot have for one another usually involve you needing to repeat your bullshit dogma to each other ad infinitum in the hopes it keeps the realization of what you have done to yourself from settling in.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. OH, and Nigel. Substitute the word “mermaid” for the word “God” in the above quote (of which you are obviously so fond) and perhaps you’ll be able to understand my sentiment.

    Again, what nonsense.

    Like

  20. “I know you are but what am I” is a poor argument, and a poor sneer.

    Dogma is merely thought that is asserting itself. Ours is based on Absolute Truth, yours is based on denying Absolute Truth.

    Like

  21. There is no “Absolute Truth” because, as based on its definition, there is no “inflexible reality” or “fixed, invariable, unalterable facts.” What you call “Absolute Truth” is nothing but belief. Even my denial of your “dogma” is based on MY belief that it is false, incorrect, and has no value.

    You have chosen to live your life based on a several thousand year of book that is essentially filled with and based on superstitions. I (and the owner of this blog) choose to reject the contents of the book and live our lives using logic and rational thought.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. If reality is relative, then your words are meaningless as no one would be able to interact.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s