Agnosticism, Atheism, Christianity, Faith, God, Religion, Truth

Matthew 24: Let’s Hear All the Theories

In the comment section of my last post, several points were made about Matthew 24. It’s not the easiest passage to come to terms with. When I was a believer, I had trouble nailing down exactly what was being talked about in this chapter, because much of the language is figurative, and… well… a straight reading of the chapter can be a bit problematic for Christians. To illustrate, let’s jump in and take the entire chapter piece by piece:

Jesus left the temple and was going away, when his disciples came to point out to him the buildings of the temple. 2 But he answered them, “You see all these, do you not? Truly, I say to you, there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.”

3 As he sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?”

So Jesus tells the disciples that the temple will be torn down, so they ask him 2 or 3 questions, depending on how you read this: 1) When will the temple be destroyed? 2) What will be the sign of your coming? 3) What will be the sign of the end of the age?

“Your coming” and “end of the age” could be tricky. They’re vague enough that people could get into some heavy speculation about what they might mean. Most of us, if we’re just allowing the passage to speak for itself, probably assume these terms are talking about the “Day of Judgment,” the “end of the world,” the “final reckoning.” And there’s good reason for thinking that. The book of Matthew talks about the Day of Judgment a fair amount (Matt 10:15, 11:22, 24, 12:36, 42). In fact, there are two passages that are worth looking at in more detail. We’ll look at one now, but we’ll save the other for the end of the post.

The first is the “Parable of the Weeds,” which can be found in Matt 13:24-30. The explanation of that parable is given in verses 36-43:

Then he left the crowds and went into the house. And his disciples came to him, saying, “Explain to us the parable of the weeds of the field.” He answered, “The one who sows the good seed is the Son of Man. The field is the world, and the good seed is the sons of the kingdom. The weeds are the sons of the evil one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are angels. Just as the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so will it be at the end of the age. The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers, and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears, let him hear.

Verses 47-50 say the same basic thing. This is what I think the disciples are asking about here in Matt 24. I’m sure some of you feel differently, and I’d like to hear your thoughts in the comment section. But for now, I’m going to assume they’re asking about the Day of Judgment.

Let’s continue:

4 And Jesus answered them, “See that no one leads you astray. 5 For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead many astray. 6 And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for this must take place, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are but the beginning of the birth pains.

So the disciples seem to be asking about the destruction of the temple, as well as the Day of Judgment. It could be that they were wrong to assume that these 2 or 3 questions they asked had anything to do with one another, but Jesus doesn’t correct them — he simply starts answering. He says there will be false Christs and political unrest, as well as natural disasters. But the end won’t happen yet.

9 “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and put you to death, and you will be hated by all nations for my name’s sake. 10 And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another. 11 And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. 12 And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold. 13 But the one who endures to the end will be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.

So after the false Christs, political upheaval, and natural disasters, Christians will become persecuted by everyone. Many Christians will fall away because of it, but the gospel will still be preached and it will go throughout the entire world. Then the end will come.

Of course, much of this is still pretty vague. When are there not wars and rumors of wars? When are there not natural disasters? And what degree of religious persecution is Jesus referring to here?

15 “So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. 17 Let the one who is on the housetop not go down to take what is in his house, 18 and let the one who is in the field not turn back to take his cloak. 19 And alas for women who are pregnant and for those who are nursing infants in those days! 20 Pray that your flight may not be in winter or on a Sabbath. 21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be. 22 And if those days had not been cut short, no human being would be saved. But for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short.

This seems to be speaking more about the destruction of Jerusalem, since it focuses on Judea. Referencing the “abomination of desolation” could refer to almost anything. In the Book of Daniel, it seems to reference Antiochus Epiphanes, but he had died long before Jesus’ time. It’s hard to say what Jesus may have interpreted it to mean.

Since this section seems to deal with the fall of Jerusalem, it would have been a great time for Jesus to tell the disciples that Judgment Day would come many centuries later. But he doesn’t do that. Instead, he seems to roll right into a description of the end times:

23 “Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. 24 For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you beforehand. 26 So, if they say to you, ‘Look, he is in the wilderness,’ do not go out. If they say, ‘Look, he is in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. 27 For as the lightning comes from the east and shines as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 28 Wherever the corpse is, there the vultures will gather.

He warns them to not be led away by false Christs. And I think verse 27 is saying that when the “Son of Man” comes, everyone will know it. There will be no need to “spread the word” — it will be evident.

29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 30 Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

This passage says that after the preceding events, the Son of Man will come with great power and glory. His angels will gather the elect from the entire earth. What could this be, but the Judgment? It matches up very well with Jesus’ explanation of the “Parable of the Weeds” that we read earlier. Matthew 24 then follows up with this section:

32 “From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts out its leaves, you know that summer is near. 33 So also, when you see all these things, you know that he is near, at the very gates. 34 Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.

So when you see these things happen, you’ll know that the time is near. Verse 34 then says that these events would occur within their lifetime. Which events? All of them. Of course, that didn’t happen. And that’s why so many Christians wrangle with this passage and try to find another meaning for it. It’s also important to notice an earlier passage in Matthew that says the same thing (Matt 16:26-28):

For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul? For the Son of Man is going to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay each person according to what he has done. Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.”

Jesus apparently expected the end of the world to occur within a few decades at the most. 2000 years and a lot of other failed “end of the world” prophecies later, and we’re still here.

But what about the rest of the chapter? Does it say anything to make us rethink the notion that Jesus’ prediction of the end of the world was so wrong?

36 “But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. 37 For as were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, 39 and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 40 Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken and one left. 41 Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one left. 42 Therefore, stay awake, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. 43 But know this, that if the master of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into. 44 Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.

45 “Who then is the faithful and wise servant, whom his master has set over his household, to give them their food at the proper time? 46 Blessed is that servant whom his master will find so doing when he comes. 47 Truly, I say to you, he will set him over all his possessions. 48 But if that wicked servant says to himself, ‘My master is delayed,’ 49 and begins to beat his fellow servants and eats and drinks with drunkards, 50 the master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he does not know 51 and will cut him in pieces and put him with the hypocrites. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

So Jesus goes on to say that no one, only God, knows the day and hour that the end will come. Jesus himself didn’t even know. Does that change things? Does that mean that his earlier decree can be ignored? I don’t think so. Jesus (more than once) said that the end would come within a generation. The passage we just read simply says that the exact day and time was unknown. Jesus gave them a time range of decades, but could be no more specific than that.

This chapter, both in the way the disciples asked their questions and in the way Jesus answered them, gives the impression that Rome’s destruction of Jerusalem would herald the coming end of the world. If you think about it, that’s not all that surprising. Jerusalem fell in 70 AD, and most scholars believe the gospel of Matthew was written 10-20 years after that event. We don’t know who the author of Matthew was, but he was obviously very focused on the Mosaic Law — it’s likely that he was Jewish, or at least a proselyte. Imagine the shock he would have felt when Jerusalem fell! How could God allow that to happen, especially so soon after the “Messiah” had come? I don’t find it surprising that such a Christian would assume that signs like these must mean the end of the world was coming. And if Jesus was a real person, it’s possible he preached that the end was near as well. Every generation, a handful of people make doomsday prophecies. Some of the Old Testament prophets did too. But regardless of the author’s motivation, the end result still seems rather evident: Jesus (or at least the gospel writer) believed the end of the world was a few short years away, and he was dead wrong.

Like I said, when I was a Christian, I struggled to “make sense” of Matthew 24, because I just knew it couldn’t mean what it “seemed” to say. Now that I no longer have to make passages fit the end result I’m looking for, passages like this seem much clearer to me. But what do you think? Am I totally off in my analysis?

186 thoughts on “Matthew 24: Let’s Hear All the Theories”

  1. Arch and Kc, It remains conjecture regarding any spiritual reality. We cannot use any empirical means because there is nothing to measure or observe. We can empirically determine that death awaits us all and it would appear that it mean annihilation for everyone. Like the vast majority of human beings alive today, I do not believe that this is a reasonable outcome to life. The most ancient Christian concepts of a spiritual realm seem to be a reasonably model to me, but it is all a matter of faith.

    Like

  2. @Marc,

    I appreciate what you’ve written about your reasons for believing in Christianity. As you know, I come to different conclusions, but I like that you acknowledge it’s a faith thing. And I agree with you that it would be nice for our consciousness to somehow survive death. Currently, I don’t believe that it does, but I would like for it to be so. And I admit that there are things in this universe that we don’t completely understand. So who knows? Maybe death isn’t the end?

    Like

  3. Nate,

    Having entered into a mainstream Protestant church in my early 20’s, I remained in the Sola Scriptura mindset until my late 40’s. Seeking to know the truth about creation and our place in it, I began to discard concepts that were clearly not true about 15 years ago. The inerrancy of the Bible was the first to go. The young earth creation model and eternal torment in hell followed. Being dismayed at all of the denominations and sects that claimed to be the church of Jesus Christ, I set upon a historical quest to understand what had happened over the last two thousand years. When I got back to the first century, I found that the Church existed for many decades without a written testament. Oral tradition that included worship practices based on Jewish traditions gave the early Church its foundations. The writings of the Jewish scriptures were read when and where available, with the focus always on Jesus Christ. Although the Church had a great struggle to preserve the good news of the Gospel with the State involvement after the fourth century, it still exists beneath the considerable baggage that has been added during the imperial period. Although Orthodox Christians differ in opinion about many issues, As an Orthodox Christian I can believe in science and common sense as well as the good news of the Gospel revealed in the Divine Liturgy and Holy Tradition.

    Like

  4. Thanks for sharing that, Marc. Out of curiosity (and I mean that — I’m not trying to argue any points with you), now that you no longer believe in an eternal Hell, what good news does the gospel bring?

    Like

  5. Hi Nate,
    The good news is that there is life after death. That we can exist in the spiritual realm and again in the physical realm after the general Resurrection. We can accept this gift of eternal life or reject it, the choice is ours. The most ancient Christian understanding of the Harrowing of Hades when Jesus entered the spiritual realm after his death on the Cross, is that He preached the Gospel to all humanity back to Adam and Eve and all or most believed, were forgiven, healed, and entered into the first and spiritual resurrection. This means that most people will not encounter the true Gospel in this life, and when they enter into the spiritual realm after the death of their bodies they will understand the good news and change their minds and hearts (repent) and experience the first resurrection as well. The possibility remains that there are a few people that are so wicked that they refused to be healed and reconciled. Their choice is annihilation with Satan and the demons in the Lake of Fire.

    Like

  6. An addition aspect of Orthodox Christian understanding of the Gospel that I found attractive was that our current human condition is more in need of a medical rather than a juridical solution. Judgement is a diagnosis, not condemnation. Punishment, is a therapy for healing not retribution. Jesus Christ is seen as the great physician of our souls and bodies.

    Like

  7. Marc, It certainly sounds like you retain an open mind, and I applaud you for that. I don’t have a problem with all theists, only the ones who try to cram their beliefs down my throat, and you don’t strike me as that kind of person.

    I may or may not rib you occasionally, it’s what I do, but with your attitude, rest assured that I will be doing it good-naturedly.

    arch

    Like

  8. As much as you’ve studied religion, Marc, doubtless you’re aware of the Canaanite pantheon of gods, and the story of El, the chief god, the name of whom carries over into Judaism, and is seen in many Hebrew names, DaniEL, EzekiEL, ELijah (“My god is Yahweh”), etc. Well, old El had a son, named Yam – no relation, I’m sure, to the sweet potato – who was killed by another demi-god and went into the underworld, from which he was rescued by yet another demi-god, who returned him to the surface.

    I can see how that oral tradition might easily have found it’s way into the Christian one, with a few modifications to fit the era, of course.

    This is not unexpected, as the entire Jewish religion, from which Christianity sprang, was heavily influenced by the religions of the cultures with whom those nomads associated. The flood story, the Tower of Bable fable, even the Garden of Edin (Mesopotamian spelling) came from Mesopotamia. The god they followed, “El Shaddai,” came from the Amurrite (biblical, Amorite) culture of northern Mesopotamia, until he was merged with the desert-god, Yahwist culture of the Midianites/Kennites, of the Southern Levant, as established in Exodus 6:3 – “And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob by the name of El Shaddai, but by my name, JEHOVA (Yahweh) was I not known to them,” after which, old Amurru faded into obscurity and Yahweh became their final answer.

    It’s quite a goulash of legends from all over the region – a veritable “stone soup,” as it were —

    Like

  9. Judgement is a diagnosis, not condemnation.

    Yeah, but see, if I’m going to be diagnosed, I’d like to know the doctor doing the diagnosis didn’t get his shingle off the Internet, and any god who wastes three of his ten commandments ordering us to consider him important, and a fourth telling us when we can rest and when we can’t, doesn’t sound like much of a diagnostician to me. True leaders lead, not through orders, but by example.

    From the reputation he garnered in such books as Joshua, I’d have to recommend that he follow his own advice and extract the beam from his own eye, before he concerns himself with the mote in mine.

    Like

  10. Hi Arch,

    You raise a lot of very important issues. First of all, I think the issue of judging and condemning others regarding spiritual belief or non belief is a tremendous evil. I was well on the way to rejecting all organized religion myself due to this evil. Please feel free to rib me for humor’s sake, or if you sense that I am being judgmental or just stupid. I believe that we are all a work in progress with potential beyond our wildest dreams.

    In regards to the history of the Canaanite people and their take on spiritual reality, this is a confirmation that like most cultures spiritual concepts had developed in an oral tradition. I view the process of Divine revelation as one that is always subject to the distortions of fallen and defective human understanding. This is why I reject the inerrancy of the Bible. What I see is a process over time that culminates with the Incarnation. When God becomes a human being His revelations become much clearer, yet still subject to distortion by folks with a self serving agenda.

    Regarding the qualification of the Physician, I would compress the 10 Commandments into two: Love of God, and our fellow human beings. Because God gives us life, and because life is meant to be shared, we are in this together. We live in communion and dependency on each other, or we perish alone.

    Like

  11. Hi, Marc, let me begin with saying that I definitely do not think you are stupid, by any means.

    I believe that we are all a work in progress with potential beyond our wildest dreams.

    As do I – I have great faith in Humankind, once we grow up, but it has nothing to do with anything magical or supernatural.

    like most cultures spiritual concepts had developed in an oral tradition

    Yup, a multi-millennia game of “Telephone,” aka, “Chinese Whispers,” in which the end message bears little resemblance to the original, which was lost in the sands of time.

    I would compress the 10 Commandments into two

    I would further compress them into one, with acknowledgement to Jerry Springer:

    “Be good to yourself, and each other.”

    Like

  12. Arch,

    I suspect that you are one heck of a lot smarter guy than me, so I am blessed to have the opportunity to connect with you. Every day of our lives we are blessed to be the beneficiaries of the creative and productive energies of thousand of other human beings. It remains a mystery as to why we do not treat each other with much more respect and love. My hope and belief is that it will come to pass, but not without Divine intervention and help.

    Like

  13. Arch, I had to laugh when you said, “Marc, Marc, Marc, you sound like a hair lip dog. You and Nan take issue with what I said about “Divine intervention and help.” All that I can say, is given our understanding of the human condition and our history, can we get it done without Divine intervention and help?

    Like

  14. Well, I’m truly sorry if you feel your mother named you after the bark of a hare-lipped dog, I can just imagine having to live with that.

    As for,

    can we get it done without Divine intervention and help?

    Since, in my opinion, there is no such thing, we either do it or we don’t. Time will tell

    Like

  15. Well my dad wanted to name me Marc instead of Mark because he thought Mark was too Hebrew Arch. But if we come to a day were the seismic and cosmic situation begins to change in ways that we have never experienced before, it might be wise to look up and let go.

    Like

  16. Marc, why “look up”? Isn’t God omnipresent? Or do you picture him sitting in that throne in the sky with his long white beard and flowing robes?

    Like

  17. Cardio vascular health requires healthy pulmonary function, so I agree with your observation about not holding ones breath.

    Like

  18. Nan, I think that when the omnipresent God manifests Himself in our material reality in a fashion that is not expected, situational awareness will be very valuable.
    .

    Like

Leave a comment