@William,
“Anal, petty and grasping”. All that after assuming I was of another faith.
Sure, that sounds resolved — unless you have further accusations.
As for my opinion: Q.E.D. So good visiting this rational, skeptical atheist site.
Sabio, while you’re up there on your high horse, you may be able to still read the comments you left. Your criticisms were grasping and accusatory. nate is one of, if not the most, easy going and fair bloggers I’ve run into. You jump in here as if he’s intentionally or mistakenly misleading about some video that he was only claiming was atheist (and it is) and that he thought was neat (which he seems to think it is).
If he had made any claims regarding the origins of the video then you may have been justified. If you had simply commented on the origins of the video without your sneering accusations, then that would have been fine.
Now you’re going act as if you’re being mistreated because of your “contributions.” And I made an assumption – which I corrected and owned up to. I am sorry about that and try to limit my mistakes, though I still fail from time to time. I just wasn’t graced with your example through my youth, so I’m human and aren’t nearly perfect.
You were being anal. just like you were being petty and grasping. If you don’t like being described that way, then don’t be that way.
Sabio, Nate is far to kind to say it, but please go away. You have contributed nothing at all worthwhile to this blog (at least in recent history). In fact, you’ve made an “anal” of yourself.
Ah, vintage Sabio… accuse and allude, be challenged, claim victimhood and misunderstanding of morally pristine intentions, blame others for ‘personal’ attacks, refuse to engage any further. Glad to see you staying true to form, Sabio. (William, he’d ban you if he could and claim you and your ‘tone’ were the problem, so don’t feel bad; the guy has a real problem with being challenged but no problem at all making all kinds of sly accusations. He’s a piece of work.)
Finding Truth 
@William,
“Anal, petty and grasping”. All that after assuming I was of another faith.
Sure, that sounds resolved — unless you have further accusations.
As for my opinion: Q.E.D. So good visiting this rational, skeptical atheist site.
LikeLike
Sabio, while you’re up there on your high horse, you may be able to still read the comments you left. Your criticisms were grasping and accusatory. nate is one of, if not the most, easy going and fair bloggers I’ve run into. You jump in here as if he’s intentionally or mistakenly misleading about some video that he was only claiming was atheist (and it is) and that he thought was neat (which he seems to think it is).
If he had made any claims regarding the origins of the video then you may have been justified. If you had simply commented on the origins of the video without your sneering accusations, then that would have been fine.
Now you’re going act as if you’re being mistreated because of your “contributions.” And I made an assumption – which I corrected and owned up to. I am sorry about that and try to limit my mistakes, though I still fail from time to time. I just wasn’t graced with your example through my youth, so I’m human and aren’t nearly perfect.
You were being anal. just like you were being petty and grasping. If you don’t like being described that way, then don’t be that way.
LikeLike
LOL
LikeLike
hey, i’m here all night
LikeLike
unsubscribing — just so you don’t feel bad if I don’t return to this thread
LikeLike
I’m sure you’ll be missed.
LikeLike
Sabio, Nate is far to kind to say it, but please go away. You have contributed nothing at all worthwhile to this blog (at least in recent history). In fact, you’ve made an “anal” of yourself.
Thanks.
LikeLike
Well, guess I took too long to post that and William took care of it. 🙂
LikeLike
Wow, Sabio! Sounds like you got up on the wrong side of the floor!
LikeLike
LikeLike
Ah, vintage Sabio… accuse and allude, be challenged, claim victimhood and misunderstanding of morally pristine intentions, blame others for ‘personal’ attacks, refuse to engage any further. Glad to see you staying true to form, Sabio. (William, he’d ban you if he could and claim you and your ‘tone’ were the problem, so don’t feel bad; the guy has a real problem with being challenged but no problem at all making all kinds of sly accusations. He’s a piece of work.)
LikeLike
Nice video, arch!
LikeLike
Here’s one I think that everyone but Laurie and Marc will enjoy:
LikeLike