Agnosticism, Atheism, Bible Geography, Bible Study, Faith, God, Religion

Skeptical Bible Study: Tower of Babel

I was listening to a recent speech that Matt Dillahunty gave in Australia (listen here if you’re interested), and in part of it he brought up the story of the Tower of Babel, found in Genesis 11. It’s a story I’ve thought about several times since leaving Christianity. I don’t recall everything Matt said about it, though I know I’ll be making some of the same points he did. I haven’t been a Christian for about 5 years now, and it’s sometimes hard to imagine that I ever believed stories like this one, though I definitely did. And a number of other conservative Christians do as well.

A few days ago, I asked my wife if she remembered what God was angry about in this story, and she gave the same reason that I thought: God was angry because people were being prideful. In case you’ve forgotten, the crux of the story is that several generations after the flood, mankind was growing numerous, and they all had one common language. They decided to build a tower that would reach Heaven (see how prideful?), so God put a stop to it by confusing their language. This caused the various groups to split up, each person going along with whomever could understand him or her.

However, after looking at the details a bit more, it turns out that my recollection was a bit off. First, the people weren’t actually being prideful at all. Instead of trying to build a tower to Heaven — God’s abode — they were just trying to build a tall one to make it easier to stay in one geographic area:

Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. 2 And as people migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. 3 And they said to one another, “Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.” And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. 4 Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.”
— Genesis 11:1-4

The phrase “in the heavens” is just talking about the sky, not the realm of God. For just a moment though, let’s pretend that they really had been trying to reach God with their tower. Why would that be such a bad thing? Doesn’t the Bible repeatedly tell us to seek after God? Furthermore, would they have succeeded? On September 12, 2013, Voyager 1 actually left our solar system. In all those miles, it didn’t bump into Heaven. No earth-based tower would ever run the risk of reaching God’s home. So not only were the people not attempting that, even if they had been it wouldn’t have succeeded, and it actually would have been flattering toward God.

So if God wasn’t angry at them for being prideful, why did he confuse their language and force them apart? The next few verses give us the answer:

And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built. 6 And the Lord said, “Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. 7 Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech.” 8 So the Lord dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. 9 Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth. And from there the Lord dispersed them over the face of all the earth.
— Genesis 11:5-9

Essentially, God was just being a jerk. He was like a kid stirring up an anthill. I mean, God forbid (literally) that people advance technologically, right? Wouldn’t want them discovering things like the germ theory of disease, after all. And why prevent wars by keeping people within the same culture? Much better, I guess, to create different cultures so mistrust and bigotry can form. Furthermore, if this was such a problem at the time, why hasn’t he stopped us again? We’ve figured out ways to overcome language and culture barriers now. We’ve done so much more than just “build a tall tower.” God’s motivation in this story simply makes no sense at all.

However, if you step back for a moment and stop trying to view this as literal history with an actual god, things become clearer. Imagine living thousands of years ago and trying to make sense of the world around you. You think the world is flat and that the sun revolves around it. You don’t understand the cause of thunder storms, earthquakes, or volcanoes. You can’t imagine how animals and humans got here without some kind of creator. And if there’s a creator, why didn’t he make life easier? Why does he allow disease and starvation? There are so many difficult questions that just have no answer. And so people began to formulate answers as best they could. It’s easy to see that one of those questions may have been “why didn’t God (the gods) give us all the same language?” And so they came up with an answer.

Looking at it from that perspective, it’s much easier to understand how a story like this came to be. These people were dealing with the world as they saw it — and to them, the only reason they could think of for God not wanting everyone to have the same language, is that they would accomplish too much. They had no idea that humanity would one day find a way around that problem, rendering their explanation invalid.

Speaking as someone who grew up believing that stories like this were actual history, I know how easy it is to just go along under that assumption without question, especially if those around us believe as we do. It’s not stupidity; it’s either isolation and ignorance, or it’s stubbornness. We can help the isolated and ignorant by just being available to discuss these things when they come up. And with the Bible, there are plenty of examples to be found.

682 thoughts on “Skeptical Bible Study: Tower of Babel”

  1. From “Jews for Judaism” website:

    QUESTION: I have noticed that there are many differences between Jewish Bible translations of Daniel 9:25-26 and several different Christian Bible translations. What should be the correct readings of the disputed words and phrases?
    ANSWER:

    In our study of the different translations we will compare the Hebrew text with |that of the King James Version of the Bible. It contains the grossest errors, which are, in |whole or in part, duplicated by other Christian versions of the Bible.

    First, the King James Version puts a definite article before “Messiah the Prince” (9:25). |The original Hebrew text does not read “the Messiah the Prince,” but, having no article, |it is to be rendered “a mashiach [“anointed one,” “messiah”], a prince,” i.e., Cyrus |(Isaiah 45:1, 13; Ezra 1:1-2).

    The word mashiach is nowhere used in the Jewish Scriptures as a proper name, but as a |title of authority of a king or a high priest. Therefore, a correct rendering of the original |Hebrew should be: “an anointed one, a prince.”

    Second, the King James Version disregards the Hebrew punctuation. The punctuation |mark ‘atnach functions as the main pause within a sentence. The ‘atnach is the appropriate |equivalent of the semicolon in the modern system of punctuation. It thus has the effect of |separating the seven weeks from the sixty-two weeks: “. . . until an anointed one, a |prince, shall be seven weeks; then for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again . . .” (9:25).

    By creating a sixty-nine week period, which is not divided into two separate periods of |seven weeks and sixty-two weeks respectively, Christians reach an incorrect conclusion, |i.e., that the Messiah will come 483 years after the destruction of the First Temple.

    Like

  2. Mike,

    Your entire belief system is a fraud, perpetrated by the early proto-Catholics to destroy what was left of James’ Jewish Christianity in Judea. These deceivers and liars deliberately distorted ancient Jewish texts and added false additions to the Jewish Bible to create a new religion based on lies and half-truths. Modern Christianity is a bastard religion, conceived by the mentally ill Saul/Paul of Tarsus and his proto-Catholic Gentile followers.

    If you really want to follow Jesus’ teachings, become a Jew.

    Like

  3. ” but you have been proven wrong.”

    Weaaaaaaaaaak. After getting like his tenth point blown up sky high he resorts to getting down on one knee and begging that his points be taken seriously. I guess all out of quote mining?

    lol…………………..Motion denied.

    Lets review for the class (failing class that is)

    Matthew teaches that Jesus has the power to forgive sins without reference to the law? – CHECK.

    Matthew indicates that everlasting life is only possible through following Christ?- CHECK

    Luke indicates woman forgiven on basis of Faith in Christ ?- CHECK

    Jesus states in Luke that woman is saved by faith? – CHECK

    Gary demonstrated he is clueless on the NT, Sabbaths and even Hebrew punctuation? – DOUBLE CHECK

    oh and…um….just to make you feel you have company….

    Period
    The end
    Thats all she wrote
    Hasta La Vista baby

    in the mean time go do you some reading of the NT

    Like

  4. CHECK

    Pseudo-Luke – wrote at the turn of the second century, never met Jesus and had no idea what he did or said.

    Pseudo-Matthew – wrote about 75-78 AD, never met Jesus and had no idea what he did or said.

    Like

  5. The conversation between Arch, myself, and Mike points out one of the greatest weaknesses in the Christian belief system:

    One can find multiple positions on the same subject or doctrine if one digs hard enough in the New Testament to find it. That is why there are 30,000 different Christian denominations, sects, and cults with each one believing that they and they alone have the “real” truth. And this is why neither I, Arch, or Mike will ever be able to PROVE our position is correct to our opponent.

    And with all these differing often contradicting positions, there is no way for anyone to know what the ORIGINAL position was because the New Testament was written by anonymous authors, writings decades after the events in question, in far away places, for reasons we will never know, the truthfulness of their stories impossible to verify…and…by one very odd Jewish Pharisee who frequently had to defend himself of the allegation of being a liar.

    Like

  6. FYI, Gary, though the central character of the Book of Daniel IS Daniel, the book, like much of the Bible, was written anonymously in the 2nd century BCE, about a character who allegedly lived four hundred years earlier.

    Modern scholarly consensus considers the stories of the first half legendary in origin, and the visions of the second, the product of several anonymous authors in the Maccabean period (2nd century BCE).

    And if you can’t trust an anonymous author, who can you trust?

    Like

Leave a comment